Leo Rivera teaches the skills needed to create a soil water characteristic curve with wet end tensiometer data (Hyprop) and dry end dew point data (WP4C) that actually match up in the middle.

These techniques potentially make it possible for researchers to push their instruments past their specifications. Learn about issues surrounding these measurements, including the effects of hysteresis and changes in sample preparation methods required when you move into the wet range.

Next steps

• Download the “Researcher’s complete guide to water potential”
• Watch next: Water Potential 401 – Advances in Field Water Potential
• A comparison of water potential instrument ranges
• Water potential sensors
• Request a ZENTRA Cloud live demo
• Follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/meter-group

Questions?

Our scientists have decades of experience helping researchers and growers measure the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum.

• Talk to an expert
• Request a quote

Presenter

Leo Rivera operates as a research scientist and Hydrology Product Manager at METER Group, the world leader in soil moisture measurement. He earned his undergraduate degree in Agriculture Systems Management at Texas A&M University, where he also got his Master’s degree in Soil Science. There he helped develop an infiltration system for measuring hydraulic conductivity used by the NRCS in Texas. Currently, Leo is the force behind application development in METER’s hydrology instrumentation including HYPROP and WP4C. He also works in R&D to explore new instrumentation for water and nutrient movement in soil.

Transcript

LEO RIVERA 0:10
Well thanks for joining us today. Today I am going to talk about how to push your instruments past their specifications. And this is a topic that I am always really excited about because I love playing with instrumentation and finding ways to push them to their limits and get the best results out of the instrumentation.

LEO RIVERA 0:35
First, I want to start out by defining water potential and going over a quick overview of what was discussed in Water Potential 101 and 201. And water potential is defined as the energy required per quantity of water to transport an infinitesimal quantity of water from the sample to a reference pool of pure free water. And an easier way to look at this is in soils water potential, essentially is the energy required, for example, for a plant to pull water out of the soil. And water potential has a lot of applications in soils. And it’s an important tool and important property to understand in soils. Some important points about water potential: water potential is a differential property. So a reference must be specified. And in soils, we use pure free water at the soil surface as a reference. At this point, its water potential would be zero. And as the soil dries, we suddenly get negative values from that point. The water potential in the environment is almost always less than zero or a negative value, when discussing this is in terms of water potential. Now, this would be different for example, in saturated conditions or ponded conditions. But typically in the environment, this is almost always less than zero. Water in tissue or soil is very different from water in a glass. In soil we’re dealing water bound to surfaces, diluted by solutes, under pressure or tension. It’s a very different energy state from free water. And that really provides issues when trying to measure water and understand water as it moves through soil and how it can be uptaken by plants. Some other important points. One thing to understand is there are several names for the same measurement. So typically, when we talk about water potential, we’re talking in terms of negative units. Other terms that are used are water tension, soil suction, and soil pore water pressure. These are the same measure, but typically when we talk about these, it’s actually the opposite value. So for example, if we’re talking about a water potential at negative 33 kPa, if we were talking about this in terms of soil suction or water tension, it’d be positive 33 kPa, but we’re essentially talking about the same thing we just, it’s just displayed differently. And typically, when we’re talking about water potential in soils, we typically use units of pressure, for example, megapascals, kilopascals, meters of water, or bars. It can also be talked in an energy state for example, joules per kilogram, but typically, most people use most likely kilopascals or bars. Those are some pretty common terms.

LEO RIVERA 3:46
Water potential is influenced mostly by these four things. One is the binding of water to a surface. So in this case it’s going to be binding of water to the soil particles and other particles such as organic matter within the soil. Also, the position of water in a gravitational field. So for example, in this image that we have here of a soil profile, if we were using the surface as our reference, the deeper we go in the soil profile, we have a gravitational potential that we would have to overcome. So for example, if we were down negative seventy centimeters within the profile, we would have to overcome that gravitational potential. It’s also affected by solutes in water. So, salt increases affect the water potential. And then the last thing that we typically refer to is the pressure on the water. So hydrostatic or pneumatic. This is typically going to be when you have ponded conditions, or saturated conditions, where you actually have a level of water above your reference point, or above your point that you’re measuring at. Now, when we talk about total water potential, it’s essentially a sum of those four components that we just talked about. So we have ΨT, which is our total water potential, which is a function of Ψm which is our matric potential, which is those adsorption to the surfaces. Gravitational potential, which is, again based on position relative in a gravitational field, so Ψg. Ψo is the osmotic potential, or it’s the effect of solutes on the water potential. And then Ψp, which is the pressure potential. And all of those components combined make up the total water potential.

LEO RIVERA 5:48
Now, when we’re trying to measure soil water potential, as far as instrumentationwise, we have three different categories of tools that we use for measuring water potential, whether in the field or in the lab. This first method is solid equilibration methods. And within these methods, we have a few different tools, we have electrical resistance methods, which involves a granular matrix, where we are inserting that granular matrix into the soil, it comes into equilibrium with the soil, and we are measuring the electrical resistance of that granular matrix. We have the capacitance method, where we essentially are inserting ceramic discs that we know the moisture characteristic curve or the moisture properties of that ceramic, allowing it to come into equilibrium, and then measuring using the capacitance method, measuring the water content of that ceramic, and then outputting a water potential. And then last but not least, thermal conductivity method where we again install a ceramic cup or a ceramic material into the soil, allow it to come into equilibrium, and we measure the thermal conductivity of this material. And we’re able to use that measure to determine water potential. And with all three of those methods, it involves putting some sort of material into the soil, allowing it to come into equilibrium with the soil and making some sort of measure of that material. We then have the liquid equilibration methods, which in this method, we’re mostly talking about tensiometers. And what tensiometers do is we insert, for example, a ceramic disc, or ceramic cup, sorry, into the soil. And the ceramic cup is either filled with water or it has a shaft filled with water. You can see a picture of that example here. And what we’re doing is allowing it to come into equilibrium with the soil. And we’re measuring the pressure that as the soil pulls the water out of the tensiometer, it’s creating a suction, and we’re able to measure that with, for example, a pressure transducer. And that gives us a direct measure of the matric potential. It does not give us measures of the the other components, the osmotic potential, but it can also give us a measure of the pressure potential when we do have saturated conditions. And this is probably one of the most accurate methods. The problem with the liquid equilibration method is it’s limited within range. Typically the tensiometer we can only measure down to negative 85 kilopascals, maybe 100 kilopascals. Except for some special tensiometers, we’re able to make use of some special techniques to push the range of the tensiometers and I’ll talk about that a little bit later. And then last we have the vapor equilibration methods. And within the vapor equilibration methods we have, for example, a thermocouple psychrometer, or a dewpoint potentiometer. And with both of these instruments, essentially what we’re doing is measuring the relative humidity and using that measure of relative humidity to determine water potential.

LEO RIVERA 9:20
Another technique that’s been used for a very long time for measuring and creating moisture characteristic curves is the pressure plate. The pressure plate was introduced in the 1930s by L.A. Richards. And essentially what we have here is an apparatus where we’re inserting samples and using the pressure above the soil sample with water in a saturated sample, forcing it to come into equilibrium with the applied pressure. So for example, if we wanted to bring a sample to 10 kilopascals, we would apply a pressure of 10 kPa and let that sample come into equilibrium. And typically, we have to deal with equilibration times. For wet samples when you’re just trying to come to anywhere within the zero to 100 kPa, you’re looking at usually equilibration time of less than a day, sometimes a little bit longer. Now when we’re trying to get dry samples to come into equilibrium, anywhere between the 100 kPa and 1500 kPa, this usually takes a week or longer. And there are a lot of publications out there saying that these samples may never come into equilibrium using this technique. An example of this is in a publication by Bittelli and Flury from 2008. And so that really gives us a problem when we’re working in that range of 100 to 1000 kPa trying to get developed moisture characteristic curves and get accurate measures that it really creates issues, and so we have to look at other methods for measuring the moisture characteristic curve.

LEO RIVERA 11:12
So just some important points on instrumentation, there really is no ideal water potential instrument to measure across the full range of the moisture characteristic curve. There are many good choices for instruments, really it’s going to— what you have to think about there is is what is your goal, what range are you trying to measure within, what accuracy do you need and what is your your price price range as well. But those are all things you need to think about when looking at instrumentation. And really, these techniques must be combined to get a complete understanding over the entire range of the moisture characteristic curve.

LEO RIVERA 11:58
Some applications of soil water potential include when we use the soil moisture characteristic curve. It gives us a great understanding of what plant available water is there, can also be used for doing different measures such as surface area of soil, soil swelling potential, this is a common tool used especially in the geotechnical industry where swelling potential of soils can cause issues in road construction, home construction, and other building construction. So that’s a common application of using moisture characteristic curves. And really water potential is a key component in understanding soil and plant water relations in the field. It really is the controlling factor in plants’ availability to pull water and enable to survive in different conditions. Water flow and contamination transport studies are also a very common application of water potential because again, just as with plants being able to pull on water, water flow through soil is predominantly controlled by matric potential, and some other factors such as hydraulic conductivity, but they all play a role in water flow through soil. And of course, in irrigation management, knowing soil water potential is so much more powerful than water content because again, it gives us a better understanding of the plants’ availability to pull on the water in the soil.

LEO RIVERA 13:37
So here’s a brief outline of the rest of the presentation. We just did an overview of some of the topics discussion in Water Potential 101 and 201. We’ll go into an introduction into the HYPROP method or the Wind/Schindler Evaporation Method for measuring water potential, an introduction into the WP4C, talk about some issues with hysteresis and sample density issues, go over some special considerations when using the HYPROP, how to expand the range with the HYPROP, how to fine tune your WP4C skills, and then going into combining data from the two instruments to create the full moisture characteristic curve. So before I start talking about the instruments, I want to talk a little bit about what we used to call this kind of no man’s land of water potential instrumentation. So if you look on this chart here, you’ll see we have this grayed out area in between about 150 to 200 kPa and negative one mega Pascal. And in the past, we really used to have issues getting good measures within this range to really fully characterize what’s going on in the soil. And in many instances this is an important range within the moisture characteristic curve and so it was really imperative that we find a way to close that gap and find instrumentation that can help us cover the full range of the moisture characteristic curve. And in the past with some of the older techniques, even with the dewpoint technique, before some recent changes, we were not able to fill that gap and get good measures within that range. But we’ve made some strides and have really been able to push our capabilities in making these measures and we’ll discuss that in further detail as we go through these slides.

LEO RIVERA 15:26
So, first one is talking about the Wind/Schindler Evaporation Method. And essentially what we have when using the Wind/Schindler evaporation method, we have a device where we have two tensiometers at different points within the soil. And we’re measuring the change in soil suction, or the change in water potential as a soil sample naturally dries at the surface. And what this gives us is, one, a measure of the change in water potential. It also gives us a change in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. So we’re able to not only do the moisture characteristic curve, but we’re also able to do an unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curve. And we’ll talk a little bit about the math that goes into that here. So when running the HYPROP, the HYPROP is set up with a saturated soil sample. So before putting the stamp on HYPROP will fill the tensiometers. And I’ll talk a little bit about the filling process of a tensiometer. And then we’ll take a saturated sample, and auger out two small holes for the tensiometers, and put the sample on the HYPROP. We will then set the HYPROP up on a scale and connect it to a computer and we’re logging over time the change in water potential at the two different points within the sample and the change in weight as the sample dries down. And this allows us to get the water content change and the change in water potential of the sample to help us generate that moisture characteristic curve. Typically this process takes about four to seven days, depending on the soil texture, also depending on conditions within the room that will control the rate of evaporation. So just briefly go into the calculations that the HYPROP does to measure the water potential and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. And we won’t focus too much on this. But essentially what we’re doing is again, at two different points within the sample, over time, we’re measuring the tensions at the two different points and the sample weight. And so what we’re able to do is we’re able to take the average water content or the change in water content and the media water tensions and give a discrete value of the retention function at any time. And that’s a really amazing thing to be able to do because we’re able to generate a lot of points across the moisture characteristic curve over time, very simply with little work once the apparatus is set up. And just to reference where a lot of the work that goes into this technique came from, there’s a good publication by Uwe Schindler and L. Müller from 2006, titled “Simplifying the evaporation method for quantifying soil hydraulic properties.” So if you want a good read on the evaporation method, that’s a great publication to look into.

LEO RIVERA 18:40
So some other calculations, we are also able to calculate the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using the Darcy-Buckingham’s Law. And essentially what we’re doing is using the main hydraulic gradient or the change in tension between the two different tensiometers, along with a change in water content. And by using those combined factors, we’re able to determine the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity throughout the drying process. Now, one limiting factor here is in wet conditions, when there’s little difference between the bottom and the top tensiometer. We’re not really able to determine an unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. So, in some samples, especially very coarse samples, we can only generate a few points along the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curve as a sample dries. Now with the HYPROP and with many techniques, there are assumptions that are made. One assumption is that there is quasi steady state conditions and essentially what that means is that the evaporation rate over the soil sample remains fairly constant over the entire process, and so that’s mostly going to go back to conditions within the room staying constant. And that’s an important factor. And we’ll kind of discuss that a little bit more when using the HYPROP. Another assumption that’s made is linear decreasing water content over the sample height within the measurement interval. And there was a lot of work done, and a lot of that work is done in that paper that I just talked about, to determine if this was really a valid assumption and if that really worked well for this with technique. And what they found is that it did work, and that’s why the HYPROP was made the way it was made.

LEO RIVERA 20:43
Okay, now we’ll go on to the chilled mirror dewpoint technique. And essentially what we’re doing with the chilled mirror dewpoint technique, we’re taking a mirror attached to a thermoelectric cooler, and warming and cooling the mirror until we reach a dew point, and measuring the formation of that dew with an optical sensor. And what that gives us by doing this with a sample that’s coming to equilibrium within that chamber, we are able to determine the relative humidity of the sample. And some other measures that are made— so we use the mirror temperature when the dew is forming. And we do this continuously until we find that we’ve reached a steady state or an equilibrium within the sample chamber. And we’re also measuring the sample temperature with an infrared thermometer. And water potential is approximately linearly related to the sample temperature minus the dew point temperature, or it’s essentially the vapor deficit. And we’re able to relate relative humidity to water potential by using the Kelvin equation. So by using the relative humidity and the water potential and using the Kelvin equation together, we’re able to get a direct relationship of water potential.

LEO RIVERA 22:23
Now I bring this chart up to kind of talk about, to show changes in relative humidity at different water potential points. So I think an important one to look at is look at the relative humidity at field capacity. We have a relative humidity of .9998. And then the relative humidity at permanent wilting point with relative humidity of .989. That is a very small change in relative humidity. And so it requires an accurate measurement of relative humidity to really get an accurate measure of the water potential. And in the past, you know, we’ve been able to do a pretty good job of this, but we weren’t really able to push ourselves up into that wet end until probably now we’re able to push ourselves further up into the wet end. And I’ll talk about that a little bit as I continue to talk about the WP4C. But I did want to show this because it shows that with this technique, you really need an accurate measure of relative humidity to get an accurate measurement of the water potential. So with the WP4C, typically we use the WP4C as the dry range instrument, whereas we’re using the HYPROP as the wet range instrument. And we use those two instruments together to get the full moisture characteristic curve. And with the WP4C, we’re able to measure water potential with an accuracy of plus or minus 0.05 megapascals and with this, we’re having to resolve temperature differences of a 1,000th of a degree. And that’s a very, you’re looking at very small changes. They’re just like I talked about what the relative humidity changes. So with I mean, with these improvements in the past, we were not able to measure that accurately with this technique. But now with latest improvements we’re really able to improve the technique and push ourselves up into the negative 50— in between the negative 50 and negative 1000 kPa range which really is powerful when trying to combine this instrument with another instrument like the HYPROP.

LEO RIVERA 24:42
Okay, so now we’re going to go into some hysteresis and sample density issues, talk about some considerations when using the HYPROP, and how to expand the range with the HYPROP and fine tuning your WP4C skills. So, you know, one thing that has been showed is hysteresis is a well known phenomenon in soil. And the definition of hysteresis is, difference in the relationship between the water content of the soil and the corresponding water potential obtained under wetting and drying processes. And below is an example of that, where we have a few different soil types that we’ve generated moisture characteristic curves, using both the wetting and drying process. And this is a great example showing the hysteresis within that sample. And this is something that has to be considered when using any instrument and how you run the instrument to combine them together to generate the full moisture characteristic curve. And I’ll show you a great example of this where we use two different techniques with the two different instruments and it created some some pretty drastic differences in the moisture characteristic curve. Another thing that has to be considered is sample density. Prior to the upgrades made to the WP4C, where we weren’t quite able to accurately measure up into the wet range, sample density was not much of an issue. And but as we now try and push further up into the wet end, it becomes more critical. And below the graphic kind of shows some of the— or shows the different absorptive forces kind of across the moisture characteristic curve. So as we’re getting into the wet end, so the 100 kPa to the saturated to negative 100 kPa range, we’re dealing mostly with capillary forces and the water being held by the capillary forces within the soil sample. And so in this case, soil structure, sample density are going to be very critical and gonna have a major effect on the water potential. But as we get drier and get more into the absorbed film range, we’re dealing more with water absorbed just the soil particles themselves. And there’s been research showing that in this range, sample density doesn’t play, and structure doesn’t play nearly as much of a role. And so we can get away with using disturbed samples to get measure within this range. But as we’re trying to push into the wet range, now we’re dealing with sample density issues and this has to be considered when taking samples and trying to measure the moisture characteristic curve.

LEO RIVERA 27:53
So some considerations with the WP4C. The first thing you want to think about, of course, is your sample collection. You need to determine whether you want to take an intact sample or use a disturbed sample. If you’re not really concerned with pushing into the what range or if you’re using a disturbed sample throughout for generating your entire moisture characteristic curve, then it’s okay to use disturbed samples. But if you’re using intact samples, and you’re trying to push into this wet range, you might want to consider taking intact samples for both instruments, say for example an intact sample with the HYPROP and an intact sample for the WP4C. And this is possible with the stainless steel sample cups. You can go out into the field, dig a small little trench or a small hole and lightly tap the sampling rings into the soil and take out a small intact sample. And this was something that we did for some samples that we ran and I’ll show some of the results from that later. Now, if you’re going to use disturbed samples with the WP4C, what you want to do is you want to take a soil sample, put it in the cup and add a certain amount of water, and you want to use multiple samples and add different amounts of water to each sample to get different points along the moisture characteristic curve. What you do is add the water to the sample, mix the sample, seal it, and let it stand for 24 hours, allowing it to come into equilibrium. And then you’ll take that sample and do a sub sample into your sampling ring and run that on the WP4C. So some other considerations. Really, I always feel that the more samples, the better. Typically when we’re running moisture characteristic curves, we use anywhere from 10 to 15 samples at different water contents to generate the dry end with the WP4C. And one thing that you really have to watch out for, especially if you’re trying to push further up into the wet end with instrument is you need to run your measurements in a room with stable temperature conditions. Temperature variations due to heating or cooling can cause major issues when trying to measure in the wet range. So you really want to look out for that, and I’ll show something that we use, it’s gonna look very crude, but something that we use to help establish more stable conditions around the WP4C. When running your samples for dry samples, just say drier than negative 2 megapascals, you’ll want to run— you can run the samples in precise mode or even fast mode for the very, very dry samples. And this will give you an accurate measure for that range. And as you get further into the wet end, you’re going to want to run samples in continuous mode. And typically when you’re doing this, it helps to have the WP4C connected to your computer. And you can use hyperterminal program, or you can also use the AquaLink software to watch the changes in water potential. And what you’ll do is you’ll just run it in continuous mode and watch for stable measurements. And so you’ll be looking at the outputs from the WP4C and look for continuous output of the same measure— of the same water potential value within a small amount. And this will give you a indicator that you’ve reached equilibrium within the sample temperature and you have stable conditions in there or within the sample chamber.

LEO RIVERA 31:54
Now going back to that temperature stability thing, if you are in a room that does have some minor fluxes in temperature due to air conditioner coming on and off, or heating unit coming on and off, one thing that does help and it seems kind of crude, but it does work is putting the WP4C in a box to help create a more stable boundary around the WP4C. And you can see an example of what we’ve used in the lab. And it’s just a simple cardboard box where we have a piece of Velcro that allows us to open and close the box back up. And this is a great way to help create stabler conditions around the WP4C and allow you to push yourself further up into the wet red and wet end with the instrument. Now, essentially what you’ll do is you’ll insert the sample, seal the chamber, allow it to read—typically when running a precise mode, you’re looking at around five to 10 minutes per sample for it to come to equilibrium. And as you get into the wet range and you’re running it in continuous mode, you’re looking at anywhere from 15 minutes up to maybe even 30 minutes on the very wet end to come into equilibrium. You’ll then take that sample back out, weigh it, dry it and weigh it again to get your water content to correspond with that water potential point.

LEO RIVERA 33:28
Okay, now, before we go on to talking about the HYPROP, I want to go again and talk about that No Man’s Land. And one thing that’s really helped with this, along with improving our capabilities with the WP4C is the extended range that we’re able to obtain with the HYPROP tensiometer. So like I talked about before, typical operating range for a tensiometer is, say, zero to negative 100 kPa. After that you start getting into cavitation due to actual boiling of the water under vacuum. And so that’s a really limiting factor. And what we’ve been able to do is we’ve used special ceramic and special tensiometers on the HYPROP that with with proper use and good technique, we’re able to push the tensiometers even further up into the water potential range. It’s possible to push the tensiometers up to negative 250, and I’ve heard some instances, and this is not something I’ve been able to attain, but of pushing the tensiometers all the way up to negative 350 and 400 kPa, which is phenomenal. But, you know, we are able to push the tensiometers further than normal, which allows us to help close that gap in the water potential range. And so this is something that we’re able to do with the HYPROP to help close that gap.

LEO RIVERA 34:54
And so, now to go into some considerations with the HYPROP. One thing that is absolutely critical with the HYPROP is filling of your tensiometers. If you really want to maximize your capabilities with the HYPROP, you really want to focus on a good fill of the tensiometers, to really push them up into the range. We’ll talk a little bit more about some things to consider there. As with the WP4C, again you want stable conditions in the room because of the assumptions that are made in the calculations, that quasi steady state assumption. And so it’s always helpful to have a room with semi stable conditions. It’s not quite as critical as with the WP4C, but it’s definitely critical. And so that’s something you want to look out for. And another thing because we’re taking weight measurements, you want a stable platform for these weight measurements. You don’t want to table that’s going to be getting bumped into, you don’t want to have a weight room right next to your lab, which was an issue that we’ve had before, where weights are getting dropped on the floor and actually causing the platform to shake and messing up your weight measurement, so again, a stable platform for weight measurements is very important. So now let’s go back and let’s talk about that extended measuring range with these tensiometers that allows us to push this a little bit further up. There are three factors that influence the extended measurement range of a tensiometer. The first factor is the bubble point. If your tensiometer has a low bubble point, then you’re gonna get air in there anyways, once you reach a certain suction, but with the tensiometers used on the HYPROP, they actually have a bubble point of 8.8 bars. So that’s really not a factor there. So we’re able to push the bubble point, and it’s not going to limit what we can do with the tensiometers. Another factor is going to be the vapor pressure or the boiling point of the water. Typically, depending on elevation and some other conditions, your boiling point of water under suction is going to be—at room condition, so at 20 degrees C—you will reach a boiling point of water at 20 degrees, or at sorry, I believe 99.7 kPa of suction at sea level. And of course this changes as you change in elevation you do get a change in your boiling point at room temperature under vacuum. And so the third factor is the ability for boiling retardation. What allows us to do this is, in order for the water to boil, it needs a nucleation site. And so the shafts on these tensiometers, the inner shaft tensiometers for the HYPROP have a smooth surface in order to prevent any possible nucleation sites for boiling. And so we’re going to talk a little bit further about that. But so in order to maintain that, we need to make sure the shafts stay clean. But here’s an example of us being able to push the tensiometers further up into the measurement range. And so here’s a actual measurement with one of the HYPROPs where we were able to push the top tensiometer up to about 1900 hectopascals, so which is 190 kilopascals, which is well beyond the typical measuring range of a tensiometer. And we were able to push the bottom tensiometer all the way up to almost 2200 hectopascals, so almost 220 kilopascals, which is a great area to reach or something you want to try and reach with these HYPROPs. It is possible to push them into this range and beyond that. So keys to a good fill. Whether you’re using the syringes or a vacuum system, it’s important that these three things below are considered. One you want to have well degassed water. If you don’t have to get well degassed water, you’re not going to have a good measure. And the only thing that really helps with that is time. So you just have to take your time when degassing the water, whether you’re using the syringes or using the vacuum system. And again, I clean inner tensiometer shafts and clean HYPROP. What controls this is how you finish up using the HYPROP. If you don’t clean the HYPROP properly before removing the tensiometer shafts, you run the risk of getting soil particles or dust or other things inside of your tensiometer shafts or inside of the HYPROP sensor cavities. And this will provide a nucleation site and really reduce your ability to push the tensiometers further up into the range. And then of course, last but not least, patiencs. With this instrument, the only thing that helps in getting a good fill is time and taking your time. And so you want to have patience when filling the tensiometers, especially with the syringes. That takes more patience than any of the other— than using a vacuum system. But if you’re patient with your fills and you take your time, even using the syringes, you can push your tensiometers well beyond the normal measuring range of a tensiometer.

LEO RIVERA 40:59
And so one thing I wanted to go into is using a vacuum system and some things you want to consider because this is a question I get a lot. One thing you especially need when using a vacuum is a leak free system. So that goes into the type of line you use, the type of connectors you use, and using kind of, not high quality, but you don’t want to use old line or old connectors because you run the risk of having a leak. One image you can see here is to connect the tensiometer shafts to the vacuum line I actually use a silicone rubber that has a slightly smaller inner diameter than the tensiometer shaft outer diameter. And this allows us to get a good seal around the tensiometer shafts. And then the tensiometers will be placed in a beaker with previously degassed water and then put under vacuum and the water is pulled in through the tensiometer shafts to fill that— through the outer parts of the tensiometer shafts to fill the inner part of the tensiometer. Another consideration is you do not want to use too powerful of a vacuum system. If you use too powerful of a vacuum system, you’re going to blow out the pressure transducers, which is something you want to avoid. So typically when we’re looking at this, when you’re putting the tensiometers and the HYPROP system itself under vacuum, you want it to take anywhere from 20 to 30 seconds, maybe even up to 45 seconds to reach the full vacuum of your system, which is going to be about 87 to 90 kPa, again, depending on your elevation. And what helps to protect the pressure transducers is a buffer bottle. We use a one litre buffer bottle. This helps protect the pressure transducers, one, from the pulsing of the vacuum system because vacuum systems do pulse as they’re pulling a vacuum and if it has too strong of a pulse, it can damage the pressure transducers. One thing that helps when doing this setup is having an external pressure gauge. This allows you to watch the pressure change over time. And it also allows you to know when to come back and put the system under vacuum again, as you’re filling tensiometers. Another thing that might be helpful is a desiccant chamber in line to prevent damage to the pump. Because you’re pulling vacuum over water and pulling on this water and essentially pulling air out of the water, you’re gonna have air that’s close to or not at 100% relative humidity. And this for some types of vacuum systems can damage them. So you might want to consider having a desiccant chamber in line. Another, when you’re doing this, typically you want to put the system under vacuum from anywhere from 12 to 24 hours to get a good film. And so this again goes back to that patience thing.

LEO RIVERA 44:12
So another great thing that allows us to even further extend the range of the tensiometers is we’re able to use the air entry point of the ceramic to get another measurement point along the moisture characteristic curve. Because so what happens when you’re running a tensiometer, so you’re running it through normal range, and then it cavitates. So and typically when it cavitates, with these tensiometers, it’ll drop down to about 880, 860 hectopascals or 88 kilopascals. And then if you allow it to keep running, eventually what’s going to happen is you’re going to reach the air entry point of the ceramic within the soil and with the ceramic it’s about 8.8 bars. And when that air entry point is reached, you’re going to see a very fast drop from 880 hectopascals all the way down to zero. And so we’re able to use that point, that drop point as a reference to when the soil reached 880 kilopascals or 8.8 bars. So that gives us another point on the moisture characteristic curve, which is really useful when combining this with instruments like the WP4C. So there is a publication on this. And it’s by it’s— seem to have lost it. It’s another one by Uwe Schindler. It’s titled— I can’t think of it. Sorry, it’s pertains to pushing. I think I have actually one of the next slides. So we’ll look for that.

LEO RIVERA 46:08
But now we’ll talk a little bit about combining data from the two instruments— Oh, sorry, actually, this is out of place. Okay, so now we’re gonna talk a little bit about combining data from the two instruments. When creating the full moisture characteristic curve, it used to be a little bit more of a pain when you’re trying to model and generate fits to data from two different instruments. But with the HYPROP-FIT software, we’re able to combine data from the two instruments fairly easy with the HYPROP-FIT software. You can kind of see a screenshot of that below here. This allows for fitting different curve models to a data set. So for example, you wanted to combine— you wanted to generate a fit using the Van Genuchten equation or the van conducted by modal or Brooks and Corey or whatever model you’d like to use and fit that to your data. You can easily add data from a variety of instruments whether it be the WP4C or pressure plate or thermocouple psychrometer or whatever it is that you might use, you’re able to combine data from the HYPROP to the WP4C within the same data set and generate the fit using the HYPROP-FIT software. And so really quick I want to show an example of some soil samples that we’ve run using the HYPROP and the WP4C. The three samples I’m going to show you our, one is a kiona, very fine sandy loam. It’s about 64.4% sand, 10% clay, and 25.6% silt, and this is data based on NRCS Soil Survey. The second sample was a schawana lomi fine sand, 79.4% sand so very high in sand, low clay content, and pretty low silt content too. And then the last sample I’m going to show you is a Palouse silt loam. Those values are out of place. I think it’s about 21% sand, 67.7% silt, and 21% clay. Yeah, so not sure what happened there. But here’s that schwana loamy fine sand. And what we’re looking at here is, the triangular data points are data points generated by the HYPROP and you’re looking at water content on the y axis—volumetric water content—and water potential in kilopascals or negative kilopascals on the x axis. And then we have square data points generated by the WP4C. And you can see we were able to push the WP4C all the way up into the, almost field capacity point of this sample and matching that up with the HYPROP. And this allowed us to generate a very nice moisture characteristic curve and generate a nice fit to that moisture characteristic curve using the Van Genuchten bimodal equation. So now our next soil sample is a kiona fine sandy loam. And on this sample we were going back to the issues with hysteresis. And so with the HYPROP we’re using drying technique, and for this sample, when we were running it on the WP4C, we use a wetting technique where we added, so we’re slowly adding water to the different samples. And what that caused was us to have a little bit of a miss when measuring in between the about 100 kPa and 1000 kPa. And so this shows that issue that we run into with hysteresis. And so it’s something that you have to consider. And so one thing that you can do to counteract this is use, instead of a wetting technique with the WP4C samples, you can use a drying technique where you fully wet the samples and dry them down at different rates for the different samples and then let them come into equilibrium and measure those on the WP4C. And the next example is an example where we did that. So this is a Palouse silt loam. And with the Palouse silt loam, we were able to push the samples all the way up into the wet end with and mash them up with the HYPROP. You’ll see a little bit of discrepancy between the HYPROP WP4C and that’s mostly due to the fact that that’s in the zero to negative 100 kPa range where the WP4C is not always going to be 100% accurate. But within this sample, we also used intact samples that you saw from some of the images earlier. We use those intact samples to run in the WP4C and make those measurements using a drying technique. So we saturated all of the samples, and then let them dry down and dried them down at different rates. So this is one sample showing what you can do with these two instruments together.

LEO RIVERA 52:20
So in summary, there are many tools available when you’re wanting to measure water potential in soils and you have to consider what your goals are, what range are you working in? What are you wanting to— What are you trying to measure? How are you wanting to do this, are you in the lab or in the field? And again, what’s your price range? The HYPROP and the WP4C are a good option when trying to measure and generate the full moisture characteristic curve in the lab. But of course with these two instruments, it does require some skill and technique and some practice. It just, it takes a little bit of time to get good at using these two instruments together. But it can be done and you can generate some really nice data using them. And as with any tool for measuring soil water potential, again, there’s a bit of skill required to use the instrumentation to its full potential. You know, for further conversation on this topic, please visit the soil water potential section of our forums and leave some discussion points and we’d love to chat about this and see what you guys are doing out there and see if we can learn from you, if you can learn from us. So we always love to discuss these these things. So please visit our forum section and leave some questions or some topics and we’ll go further into them. So now we’ll go on into questions.